As title states... what are the pros and cons of each kit?
I've been doing some research lately, and it appears that most agree that Aquamist is very good but extremely expensive.
After talking to a Rep over on E90 he mentioned that Aquamist has no Failsafe when used with Cobb. "Cobb doesn't dynamically adjust boost in response to Meth Flow".
He suggested using a Meth kit alongside JB4 and an FSB. Is this method reliable at sensing meth flow problems? If it can sense pump issues , can it also sense when meth is flowing through turbine but NOT making it to the engine?
Excuse the questions, this is my first time with Meth and I need to make an informed choice.
So choices are:
I've been doing some research lately, and it appears that most agree that Aquamist is very good but extremely expensive.
After talking to a Rep over on E90 he mentioned that Aquamist has no Failsafe when used with Cobb. "Cobb doesn't dynamically adjust boost in response to Meth Flow".
He suggested using a Meth kit alongside JB4 and an FSB. Is this method reliable at sensing meth flow problems? If it can sense pump issues , can it also sense when meth is flowing through turbine but NOT making it to the engine?
Excuse the questions, this is my first time with Meth and I need to make an informed choice.
So choices are:
- Coolingmist with progressive controller and FSB (BEST with Jb4).
- Aquamist with Cobb (which I already have)
- BMS Kit with JB4 / FSB failsafe (?)