Couldn't find anything that touched on the title except one post. Its not entirely related to ATR but also TP, so that why this question was not posted in the ATR section.
So far tested this table works on the 335is on it previous and latest ROMs . The Offset adds load that increases boost that can be dictated by gear
However, this was tested on a IJEOS to see if it would have any affect on Load or boost and it absolutely did nothing
Not sure if this table works based on ROM version or DME version MSD80 vs MSD81
Has anyone played with this table on a non "IS" N54 and seen increase in load and boost in logs ?
Non IS stock table (Used in Cobb's OTS maps also for the 335is)
![Click here to enlarge]()
IS Stock table:
![Click here to enlarge]()
Another thing to mention is that the P-Factor table on the 335is was developed around the Load Target Offset table. It is remotely difference from the P-Factor table on non IS models.
This is where I believe BMW claimed the 8 second over boost feature on the stock IS which was based off of the Offset and P-Factor table
So far tested this table works on the 335is on it previous and latest ROMs . The Offset adds load that increases boost that can be dictated by gear
However, this was tested on a IJEOS to see if it would have any affect on Load or boost and it absolutely did nothing
Not sure if this table works based on ROM version or DME version MSD80 vs MSD81
Has anyone played with this table on a non "IS" N54 and seen increase in load and boost in logs ?
Non IS stock table (Used in Cobb's OTS maps also for the 335is)
IS Stock table:
Another thing to mention is that the P-Factor table on the 335is was developed around the Load Target Offset table. It is remotely difference from the P-Factor table on non IS models.
This is where I believe BMW claimed the 8 second over boost feature on the stock IS which was based off of the Offset and P-Factor table